Right Steps & Poui Trees

Disaster Risk Management Order No. 9 – Dated July 1, 2020

5 Comments

The Gazette of the most recent Disaster Risk Management (Enforcement Measures) Order was posted on three government websites this afternoon (July 9, 2020). The Gazette of this Order – No. 9 – is dated July 1, 2020, although it wasn’t gazetted on or before July 1. This doesn’t surprise me anymore, as it seems to be common with the gazetting of these Orders, that they are given a date which is earlier than the date on which they are actually gazetted.

A copy of the Gazette is provided here:

The Disaster Risk Management Order No 9 cover page blog pic

The Disaster Risk Management (Enforcement Measures) (No.9) Order – July 1 2020

I tweeted earlier this week about this ongoing, unsatisfactory situation regarding the delay in gazetting the Disaster Risk Management Orders.

SG tweet re no gazetted order - July 6 2020

 

OPM website Order No 9 posted July 9 2020 blog picThese are the links to the document on the Ministry of Justice website, the Office of the Prime Minister’s website and the Ministry of Health & Wellness’ website.

Author: rightpouitree

Navigating the real and virtual worlds and sometimes writing about what I observe...

5 thoughts on “Disaster Risk Management Order No. 9 – Dated July 1, 2020

  1. I missed reference to the enhanced protocols (need for pretesting) for those coming from AZ, FL, NY and TX from July 10. My oversight?

    Liked by 1 person

    • You have identified an area in which the Gazetted Order differs from what the Prime Minister announced on June 29. In the Gazette the date for pre-testing to begin is July 15, not July 1 as announced by the PM. There is no mention of the July 10 date in the Gazette. Or of any specific places identified as high risk areas. (That is probably a changing list under MOHW’s designation of places as high risk & must have expanded to include more than the mentioned US states by now.) Another illustration of why the delay in gazetting and making the Gazette available is a concern.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Yes, I’ll raise it on Twitter.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Thanks. It was a thorough piece on the issues. Not seen any official reactions.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s